Vegan, Attempt #2

October 19th, 2010

Vegan.  Again.  Attempt #1 was about a year ago, and ended on the fifth day with me devouring a filet mignon, medium rare, and a brilliant baked potato with sour cream, butter, cheese, and bacon bits.  Oh, and spinach artichoke dip to start.

What’s changed this time around?  How have I made it 3+ weeks?  Well, for starters, I have a goal: losing weight.  And it’s worked so far. I went from 254 lbs to 239 lbs (that’s 15 lbs for those of you who can’t do basic math).  But the REAL deal is that I’m allowing myself to cheat–one or two meals a week, I’ll have meat/dairy.  I haven’t craved.  This is a good thing.  I’ve also found a lot more substitutes for things, and have done my best to explore new options.

So am I a vegan?  Absolutely not.  I like leather, both as my car seats as well as my shoes and belt.  I still like the occasional burger, steak, or chicken; but I’ve scaled it WAY back.

I’ll keep you posted on how it goes.  As it stands…if I can get to 230 lbs and stay there through 12/31, I’ll be up $300.  Wish me luck!

The Rest

October 17th, 2010

A lot of you are upset that I haven’t posted any more online dating stories.  The fact of the matter is: I got a lot better at figuring out who would be psycho and who wouldn’t.  This has distinct advantages and disadvantages; of course I wouldn’t be meeting people whose behavior was unpredictable, but at the same time, I don’t have more stories for you.

Well, I do have stories–but they’re not as entertaining.  They’re just normal “no-chemistry” or “just not quite right” dates.

Here they are:

  • The arrogant attorney–she talked too much, and couldn’t be wrong about anything.  (Yes, that describes me–which is probably why it didn’t work.)  We had a mutual acquaintance who later told me she was crazy.  (Oh–and if you think this is you: it’s not.  Read the rules.)
  • The horrendously boring kids’ therapist from Pasadena.  From within 5 minutes of seeing her, I had to get away, but she somehow didn’t let me.  It took a walk from Le Grande Orange to Old Town for me to surreptitiously text Carlo (that IS his real name) and have him pretend that he direly needed a ride from Glendale.  She bought it, and I escaped.
  • This doesn’t count as a “date”, as we met up for me to practice taking photos of her.  She sent me some pretty old photos…  When she got to where we were going to take the photos, she immediately stripped her top off, and told me to take photos.  Nevermind that she was super overweight.  I have 6 photos of her that my siblings and their friends have seen.  I’m not sure who should be more embarrassed–her for having done that, or me for having a “no-delete” policy.
  • The “OMG, my friend who you don’t know likes you so I can’t go out with you” girl.  What the hell?  You have a friend who likes me but I don’t know her?  That’s not creepy at all…
  • The girl who had me pick her up from her house…which turned out to be a trailer park…  In person, she was 6’0″ and stunningly gorgeous.  Seriously, like model material.  But she smoked.  And spent an hour telling me about every ex-boyfriend she ever had, all her personal problems…then immediately invited me in to have sex.  I know you won’t believe this, but I declined.  Seriously.

My next post about online dating will be a little guide–a hints, or a do and don’ts list for people (aimed at women) for online dating.  Maybe it’ll help someone.

Oh–and all that said–I lifted my online dating hiatus.  eHarmony gave me a super awesome deal I couldn’t turn down.  So I’m back on.  And meeting people.  We’ll see how it goes.

Critical Thinking and the McDonalds Experiment

October 15th, 2010

A few days ago, I read about another one of those “what happens if we leave McDonalds food out” experiments.  McDonalds apparently read about it, too, and responded.  This is the general gist of the experiments:

Null Hypothesis: McDonalds is bad for you because it does not get worms, moldy, smelly, or show visible decomposition.

I’m not a McDonalds advocate.  In fact, I don’t eat there, unless I’m über hungry and want a sausage McMuffin.  And now that I’m trying to be a vegan (no, I’m not actually a vegan, I just try really hard to be), McDonalds is all but out.  But here’s my complaint: the people who are using the lack of decomposition, etc, as a reason that something is bad for you, are completely full of shit.  I mean, seriously, what kind of argument is that?  I *THINK* they’re trying to draw the conclusion that if something doesn’t decompose, it must be fake, and because it’s fake, it must be bad for you.

They have flawed logic.  And that’s what bothers me about this experiment overall. People are not showing an adequate amount of critical thinking when it comes to Internet stories.

See, in the experiment above, as the Atlantic Wire article points out, the woman put the meal on her coffee table in her apartment or house.  So there really shouldn’t be any worms.  Because that would just speak to her environment, really.  In terms of mold and other decomp, well, dry stuff doesn’t get moldy.  Like a toasted bun.  Or dried out fries.  Or dried out meat.  And salt is a gazillion (yep, it’s a number) year old method for preserving stuff.  And McDonalds is, well, the best at over salting stuff.

Now maybe that information isn’t common knowledge, or maybe people WANT to believe this stuff without thinking about it.  But what I’m predicting is more homemade experiments on everything else “proving” things with flawed methodology.  You’ll see stories (and video) of people claiming that drinking and driving is bad, and proving it by running over a liquor bottle with a car.  In slow-mo.

Pretty please, be critical thinkers.

AppleTV

October 1st, 2010

Apple TVI bought the new Apple TV with my American Express points.  It’s pretty darn neat; it’s very very small (that’s me holding it right there; it’s smaller than three old-school CD jewel cases stacked up), and it’s quick.  It loads right up, and connects easily to my computer, iPad, iPhone, and the internet.  Very impressive.  My primary goal of buying it was that I’d be able to watch hi-def versions of my favorite TV shows on demand.  The problem?  TV studios apparently didn’t all agree to the pricing model.  Apparently, $0.99 per episode (to rent, not buy) just isn’t enough.

I don’t agree with this sentiment.  While $0.99 per show may not sound like much, it actually is right on par with the competition.  A viewer buys every episode in a season, which adds up to between 20 and 30 episodes.  Let’s assume that’s an average of $25 per season.  What in the world is wrong with that?  That’s a lot of money, and if you add up all the shows someone like I would watch (let’s say it’s around 10 shows), that’s $250 per season of shows.  That’s pretty good, given that that’s $250 they wouldn’t have if I decided to watch the shows on TV or on Hulu.  Advertising?  Give me a break.  I see all kinds of product placement in these shows–and I’m still paying hard cash for the episodes.  And what about companies like Netflix?  I pay less than $10/month, and watch TONS and TONS of old TV shows–in fact, that’s how I watched Dollhouse and 30 Rock (and other shows).  Well over 100 episodes over the course of a couple months; I effectively paid less than $0.25 per episode.

The amount of money an advertiser pays MAY be greater than the aggregate of people purchasing the shows one-off, but the AppleTV, in addition to all the other set-top boxes, offers an amazing avenue into peoples’ living rooms.  Content is king, but not when the pricing is out of reach.

Rocket Fizz, Dr. Pepper (with sugar!)

September 28th, 2010

Rocket Fizz SignI finally got a hair cut.  It’s been over two months since the last one.  While walking to my car, I saw a neat little soda/candy shop on Green Street, Rocket Fizz.  It’s a franchise, but a neat one; they sell all kinds of candy and soda–and I mean ALL kinds…  Especially the sodas.  I have two favorite sodas; Dr. Pepper and Squirt.  I didn’t grab the Squirt, but I DID get a bottle of REAL cane sugar Dr. Pepper–and it is ABSOLUTELY delicious.  There is an enormous difference between cane sugar and corn syrup–and I don’t understand why more companies don’t sell their product with the cane sugar; it’s MUCH better.

Anyway, I also bought a bunch of different Ginger Ales and Root Beers (I don’t know why I capitalized ‘em), and look forward to trying them out.

What are YOU so happy about?

July 15th, 2010

Yep, just a photo:

The Tenets of Fanboyism

June 25th, 2010

As you all know, the iPhone 4 was released yesterday, much to the delight of Apple fans everywhere.  Like the iPhones before it, iPhone 4 offered a few new features, and improved on old ones.  In the last 24 hours, there have been tons of articles both praising and condemning the new device.

As a result of these articles, commenters from all over have gotten into arguments about the phone, most of which seem to have been summed up by, “You’re just a fanboy.”  What’s a fanboy, you ask?  A fanboy is someone who is blindingly attracted to a company and/or product, justifying its real or perceived shortcomings regardless of its consequence.

For example, there have been reported issues of Apple’s new iPhone showing reception problems when the phone is held in a somewhat common position in someone’s hand.  A rational person would say, “Gosh, that sounds like a problem.”  A fanboy, on the other hand, will defend the product, with claims like, “No one would actually hold it that way”, “Their hands must have been sweaty”, “They’re just haters because they don’t have it”, and “Every phone I’ve ever used does that”.

So am I a fanboy?  Actually, I am.  But I’m a selective fanboy, and my allegiances are petty.  Before I started using Apple computers regularly in 2002, I was a huge proponent of Microsoft.  While I was often frustrated with Windows and certain Microsoft software, I knew that the main alternative, Apple, just wasn’t ready yet.  But when Apple rolled out one of their big updates, I gave it a look–and so far, it’s been a winner.  I prefer using my Apple products, not just because they’re better for what I do, but because the support for them is far more complete.  Mind you, if Microsoft comes out with an operating system that fits my needs more completely, I will absolutely look into it.  At the moment, however, I’m happy with my Macs.  The iPhone?  It’s wonderful–but is not without its shortcomings.

So speaking of the iPhone…  Of the features people seem to like, we have:

  • New design
  • Front-facing camera & Facetalk (video conferencing)
  • Better battery life
  • Gyroscope
  • Better sound
  • Very high resolution screen

People DON’T like:

  • Antenna problems (while my bars go down when I hold the phone in this “special way”, I don’t actually hold the phone like this normally.)
  • Glass back.  Seems to be more fragile.
  • Lack of 3G support for video chatting.
  • App Store guidelines
  • Lack of multiple carrier support in the United States

What do I think?  I think that the iPhone is probably the best phone produced *OVERALL*.  I need to qualify this.  There are definitely features missing from the iPhone that I feel should be there–features that should have been there since version one.  Features like:

  • WiFi Tethering.
  • Bluetooth/Wifi/wireless sync for apps/music to the computer.
  • Bluetooth file transfer
  • Customizable notification sounds/options, like scheduling profiles, etc.

I have an Android phone–it does pretty much everything I want it to do.  So why isn’t it my main phone?  It’s not as reliable as my iPhone.  It’s not as fast.  It’s not as polished.  The battery is inconsistent.  The camera, while higher in pixels, is lower in quality.

My analogy?  I like to drive on smooth, paved road.  While I want to offroad occasionally, it’s very rare.  The iPhone is like a sleek, luxurious, and expensive sports car.  It goes very fast.  It handles very well.  It has a few awesome bells and whistles–and they work perfectly–but I’m limited to the paved road.  The Android, on the other hand, is a sleek but utilitarian SUV.  It’s quick enough, but it can’t handle the corners too well.  It’ll go offroad, but even then, it takes its time.  It does everything–and more–but it just doesn’t do it that well.

Ok, I’ve typed enough.

A little note to the Apple Store, Pasadena

June 25th, 2010

To my Apple buddies:  Thank you for making the Apple experience, especially the iPhone 4 experience yesterday, such a pleasurable one.  Everything you did yesterday was professional, courteous, and cheerful, despite the amount of time each of you put into making the iPhone launch a success.  Last night, I heard that you worked all night until every customer who had been promised an iPhone, got one. While I got mine at 11:30am on launch day, it goes to your dedication and priority of servicing the customer making sure everyone was happy.  I was helped by someone I never worked with or met before at the Pasadena store–but he followed the same paradigm that I have both come to expect and experienced as a customer of Apple: excellence.  I’ll keep coming back to 034 as long as you continue to be the best frigging Apple Store there is. (Sorry 001 transplants!)  Thank you again for being such dedicated and important members of the Apple family; you know that you’ve got a promoter right here.

(I originally wrote this as a status update on Facebook.  It doesn’t like status updates more than 420 characters.  So now it’s on my blog, hopefully to be imported by the Facebook importer.)

Geek-tionary

June 1st, 2010

I use a lot of geek-speak.  It’s often that I’ll get into a [one-sided] conversation with someone, and realize that their eyes have glazed over–I’ve geeked them out.  So here’s a little primer on some of the more basic geek:

dSLR – A digital camera that is a lot bigger than your point and shoot; it has swappable lenses.  It’s great for all kinds of photography, but fails the pocket test.

RAID – A bunch of hard drives put together to act as one.

GSM/CDMA – AT&T/T-Mobile and Verizon/Sprint’s network types, respectively.  They don’t work together.

Kernel Panic – You know it as a blue screen of death.  It’s what happens when your computer sees something bad going down, and decides to pull the emergency brake to make sure something else bad doesn’t happen.  It DOES happen on Macs–but it’s a pretty gray screen.

Memory vs. storage – When you ask someone “how much memory” a computer has, you’re really asking how much RAM (random access memory) it has.  Storage is how big the hard drive is.  Here’s an analogy: You, a human, have a brain.  You can remember most of what you need to remember almost instantly.  That means your brain is a lot like RAM.  But you have a finite amount of storage space in your head.  So when you need to look up information, you go to a library–that would be your hard drive.  You can “temporarily” store the info in your head until you’re done with it–then you probably forget it.  That’s how memory (RAM) works.  The more memory your computer has, the less often it needs to look at the hard drive (the books in a library) to get information.

BKAC Error – You should be offended if someone says this…  This means the error is Between the Keyboard And Chair. You.

Web Design vs. Coding – This one hits close to home.  Web designers are the visual architects of the web.  They make web sites LOOK a certain way.  If a page looks ugly, you can blame them.  Web Coders (or developers) make web sites WORK a certain way.  If it’s hard to get a credit card payment done, or the sign-up process for a web site is a pain in the butt, it’s their fault.  Web designers often cannot code, and web coders often cannot design.  If you see a gorgeous web site that doesn’t have any functionality, or a butt-ugly web site that works great, you know why.  Most firms have both.

Need a word/phrase defined?  Let me know.

Hard Drive Failures, Old Emails

May 31st, 2010

On Friday, I had a small disaster.  My iMac’s hard drive failed.  I don’t know what happened exactly, but I’m assuming it’s some kind of hardware failure.  While I have backups, I haven’t gotten around to actually setting them up since I moved the computer from one room to another.  Fortunately, I was able to recover 100% of my data, so life is good.  While I was thinking about it, though, I realized that I have three old hard drives that I haven’t really looked at in a while.  Two of them turned out to be dead.  The last one, however, contains files from 2002-2006–and also contains emails back from 1997…  So I spent part of the night look through them–and it brought back some fun nostalgia.

Powered by Great Matter